Transfecting human iPSC-derived cells
In vitro transfection approaches
Transfection enables the delivery of nucleic acids (DNA or RNA) into cells to modulate gene expression and study biological function. Common delivery methods for human iPSC-derived cells include physical transfection (e.g., electroporation), chemical transfection (e.g., lipid-based), and transduction (e.g., lentivirus), which are widely used to support functional studies and target validation across diverse cell types.
Reliable transfection in human ioCells
Efficient transfection in human iPSC-derived cells depends on cell population, culture conditions and delivery methods suited to post-mitotic cells. Our ioCells are built to meet these needs, offering consistent, defined human cells alongside optimised transfection workflows. When gene delivery becomes predictable and reproducible, researchers can focus on generating biologically meaningful data rather than repeatedly iterating cell transfection protocols.
In addition, CRISPR-Ready ioCells and ioTracker Cells further streamline workflows by removing the need for transfection.
Consistent cells
Proven lot-to-lot consistency in ioCells supports reliable gene delivery and improved transfection efficiency.
Optimised protocols
Access transfection protocols specifically developed for hard-to-transfect, post-mitotic human cell types.
Defined cells
Every ioCells product is characterised by ICC, RT-qPCR and RNA-Seq, supporting predictable transfection outcomes.
ioCells in action
ioCells in action
High mRNA transfection efficiency
Fig 1. mRNA transfection in human glutamatergic neurons. ioGlutamatergic Neurons were transfected with EGFP mRNA and imaged over time to assess transfection efficiency. Cells seeded at 45,000 cells/cm² were transfected 24 h post-revival with 50 ng/well EGFP mRNA. Representative images show GFP expression on Days 1, 2, and 18, with quantification (right) confirming >95% GFP-positive cells and sustained expression up to 18 days.
ioGlutamatergic Neurons provide a consistent, reliable foundation that supports efficient mRNA delivery. Lipid-based transfection of EGFP mRNA in ioGlutamatergic Neurons yields high transfection efficiency, with stable expression maintained over time.
Post-transfection cell viability
Fig 2. Cell viability following mRNA transfection in human motor neurons. ioMotor Neurons were transfected with EGFP mRNA using graded doses of Lipofectamine Stem and mRNA amount per well [control (blue); 0.1–0.2 µL reagent with 50–100 ng mRNA (others), respectively] at either Day 1 or Day 3 post-revival. Cell viability, measured by cell counts, remained comparable to non-transfected controls across all conditions, with marginally higher survival observed after Day 3 transfection.
Optimal transfection efficiency and viability depend on timing and mRNA/reagent ratios. In transfected ioMotor Neurons, cell viability data indicate negligible toxicity across different test conditions, with a slight viability benefit observed at day 3 post-neuron transfection compared to day 1.
Gene knockouts in human iPSC-derived microglia
Fig 3. Flow cytometry analysis of B2M protein expression in CRISPR-ready human microglia. At day 10 post-thaw, CRISPRko-Ready ioMicroglia were delivered a gRNA targeting B2M via lentiviral transduction or lipid-based transfection. After 5 days, B2M protein expression was assessed by flow cytometry. (A) Lentiviral delivery transduced ~20% of cells (GFP+), of which (B) a knockout of 86% was achieved, while (C) lipid-based transfection yielded 82% knockout.
CRISPR-Ready ioMicroglia facilitate rapid, robust gene editing in defined human cells with fewer transfection steps. After delivery of a gRNA targeting beta-2 microglobulin (B2M), flow cytometry data indicate high knockout efficiencies in both lentiviral delivery and lipid-based transfection.
Improving transduction efficiency
Fig 4. Lentiviral transduction of ioMicroglia. ioMicroglia cultured in a 6-well format at 80,000 cells/cm² were transduced at Day 10 post-thaw with GFP-containing lentivirus (1:100 dilution from a 20x concentrated prep) in the presence of Vpx VLPs. Five days post-transduction, no morphological differences were observed compared to control cells, and FACS analysis confirmed GFP+ cells in the majority of the population.
Lentiviral transduction of ioMicroglia, a cell type typically resistant to viral uptake, is enhanced by Vpx VLPs, which are virus-like particles engineered to package Vpx. This approach supports efficient genetic manipulation in human iPSC-derived microglia for functional and disease-focused studies.
Built-in fluorescence to track cells
Fig 5. Live-cell imaging of human microglia in neuronal co-culture. ioGlutamatergic Neurons and ioTracker GFP ioMicroglia were cultured to day 10 post-thaw. On Day 11, the GFP ioMicroglia were directly added to the neurons, and the co-cultures were maintained for 3 additional days before live imaging. Brightfield and fluorescence images were acquired using a Leica DMi8 and merged, showing a distribution of GFP ioMicroglia within the co-culture.
ioTracker Cells – human iPSC-derived cells that constitutively express fluorescent proteins – enable live-cell imaging right from the outset. Visualise cell behaviour, track morphology, and examine cell-cell interactions in co-culture in real time, without additional labelling or reporter transfection.
Transfection tips from the bit.bio team
Tulin Tatar Ozkan, PhD
Senior Scientist II, bit.bio
“We have tested DNA transfection in ioCells using Lipofectamine Stem transfection reagent as well as several other commercially available transfection kits. However, achieving efficient DNA delivery into post-mitotic cells is very challenging; the transfection efficiency was typically below 1%. Therefore, we recommend using mRNA transfection, which consistently yields much higher transfection ef..."
Kaiser Karim, PhD
Scientist, bit.bio
“As neuronal cell bodies form connections across the culture plate via neurites, the disruption of one neuron can impact the entire culture. The key is to avoid causing a ‘tear’ in the culture when handling neurons. Tilt the cell culture plate during media changes to prevent cells from lifting off the surface.”
What scientists say about ioCells
Marijn Vlaming, PhD
Charles River Laboratories
“bit.bio cells do show very consistent phenotypes and there is not much batch to batch variation. They are delivered in high numbers of batches if we need them, and we can get them delivered very quickly.”
Recommended resources
Webinar: Transfection workshop
Get practical advice for successfully transfecting hiPSC-derived cells: from recommended reagents and cell-handling tips to troubleshooting guidance to help avoid cytotoxicity.
Poster: mRNA delivery optimisation
Discover what parameters were optimised to achieve ~60-95% efficiency and sustained expression in human iPSC-derived ioMicroglia, ioGlutamatergic, ioMotor, and ioSensory Neurons.
Poster: CRISPR knockout screening
Learn how achieving high knockout efficiency in CRISPR-Ready ioGlutamatergic Neurons enabled a pooled CRISPR screening for neurodegenerative disease-relevant genes.
Contact us
Transfection success depends on both the delivery method and the cell culture. Using our optimised mRNA transfection and lentiviral transduction protocols with ioCells can help reduce variability, preserve cell health, and achieve high-quality downstream outcomes.
Need additional transfection support? Contact our team.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What factors affect mRNA transfection efficiency?
mRNA transfection efficiency depends on several cell and experimental factors, such as cell health and seeding density at the time of transfection, timing of delivery, mRNA formulation, and the amount of mRNA/transfection reagent used, among others. Optimising these variables can improve uptake, expression uniformity, and viability. Read this poster for more information about the key parameters to optimise.
Can mRNA transfection be performed in primary or hard-to-transfect cells?
Yes, absolutely. mRNA transfection does not require nuclear entry for protein expression, making it suitable for primary, non-dividing, or post-mitotic cell types when paired with optimised delivery reagents or methods (e.g., lipid-based transfection).
How does mRNA transfection differ from DNA transfection?
mRNA and DNA transfection differ in how genetic material is processed inside the cell. In DNA transfection, plasmids must enter the nucleus to be transcribed, a common challenge in non-dividing cells.
In contrast, mRNA transfection only requires cytoplasmic entry, enabling faster, more uniform expression without requiring genomic integration. This makes it well-suited to sensitive cell types and for transient expression.
How long does mRNA transfection last?
The duration of mRNA expression depends on the cell type, the amount of mRNA, and the delivery conditions. When using lipid-based transfection to deliver EGFP mRNA in ioCells, signals are detectable within 24 hours post-transfection and remain measurable for up to 18 days in neurons and up to 14 days in microglia. For applications requiring stable, longer-term expression, lentiviral transduction can be used as an alternative delivery approach.
What’s the difference between stable and transient transfection?
Stable transfection introduces genetic material that is maintained long-term, resulting in sustained expression. Lentiviral transduction is a common approach to achieve stable expression, as viral vectors integrate the gene of interest into the host cell’s genome. Transient transfection, on the other hand, delivers DNA/RNA into the cell using lipid-based methods, where it exists as an episome, but is not integrated into the genome. As a result, expression is only temporary.
Ready to browse?
Explore bit.bio’s portfolio of highly characterised, consistent, and physiologically relevant human iPSC-derived ioCells, designed to provide a strong foundation for transfection applications, and subsequently, reliable functional analyses.